Last week, McDonald’s and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) faced off in an administrative court to determine whether the fast-food chain is liable for the actions of its franchisees as a joint employer. The case arose out of hundreds of complaints filed by fast food workers alleging they were illegally threatened, disciplined, or fired after protesting for collective bargaining and a $15 minimum wage. The NLRB backs these workers and charges that the McDonald’s corporation should be held equally liable for any violations a franchisee commits against its employees. If the NLRB prevails, the ruling will overturn decades of precedent, disrupting the expectations of thousands of businesses. Significantly, it would allow workers to unionize and bargain directly with corporate headquarters, and would expose franchisors to a great deal of liability in labor matters. Click here to read the full article.
top of page
Search
Recent Posts
See AllIn an increasingly globalized world, it is extremely important to understand what is involved in enforcing judgments against foreign assets. Given that there is no global system for enforcing a judgme
3430
This is a phrase most litigators have heard, or perhaps said themselves, more than once. This phrase is intended to provoke a reactionary response in your opponent and demonstrate to them, and your cl
1120
On December 22, 2021, the Austrian Data Protection Authority (DSB) found that medical news company, NetDoktor, violated Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) by using Google LLC’s popular
600
bottom of page