MDL decisions demonstrate the need for Rule 702 Reform

There is ample evidence that some courts misunderstand their gatekeeping function in screening the reliability of expert testimony. Numerous decisions have held – contrary to the text of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 – that problems with the basis of an expert’s testimony or the application of an expert’s methodology are issues of weight rather than admissibility.

Read the full article here.

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

© Law Exchange International 2021

Web Design by

Web and Graphic Design near Grand Rapids


David Lindgren

Shakespeare House

42 Newmarket Road

Cambridge CB5 8EP


Connect with LEI

  • White Facebook Icon
  • White Twitter Icon
  • White LinkedIn Icon

Add on Facebook

Add on Twitter

Add on LinkedIn