MDL decisions demonstrate the need for Rule 702 Reform

There is ample evidence that some courts misunderstand their gatekeeping function in screening the reliability of expert testimony. Numerous decisions have held – contrary to the text of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 – that problems with the basis of an expert’s testimony or the application of an expert’s methodology are issues of weight rather than admissibility.


Read the full article here.

0 views

Recent Posts

See All

© Law Exchange International 2020

Web Design by

Web and Graphic Design near Grand Rapids

Contact

David Lindgren

secretary@lawexchange.org

Shakespeare House

42 Newmarket Road

Cambridge CB5 8EP

England

Connect with LEI

  • White Facebook Icon
  • White Twitter Icon
  • White LinkedIn Icon

Add on Facebook

Add on Twitter

Add on LinkedIn