MDL decisions demonstrate the need for Rule 702 Reform

There is ample evidence that some courts misunderstand their gatekeeping function in screening the reliability of expert testimony. Numerous decisions have held – contrary to the text of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 – that problems with the basis of an expert’s testimony or the application of an expert’s methodology are issues of weight rather than admissibility.


Read the full article here.

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

In an increasingly globalized world, it is extremely important to understand what is involved in enforcing judgments against foreign assets. Given that there is no global system for enforcing a judgme